Workshop overview:

From 1 January 2027, Basel 3.1 and the Simplified Capital Regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) will reshape how UK banks calculate and report their capital position. This is not simply a reporting change. The numbers produced will define lending capacity, pricing, growth strategy and supervisory credibility. Boards and regulators will expect confidence before go-live, not explanations after issues surface in the first reporting cycle.

The Prudential Regulation Authority's thematic work has repeatedly found the same pattern across the industry – firms apply considerably less rigour to their regulatory returns than to the audit of their annual accounts. Weak governance from senior management functions is frequently the root cause of material reporting errors, which in turn can trigger intrusive and costly skilled person reviews. The regulator, by contrast, takes a far more constructive view of firms that identify and remediate issues on their own initiative.

This workshop covers the three questions every board should be asking now. First, can we trust the numbers –  are the data, calculations, controls and reporting outputs complete, accurate and reconcilable? Second, can we explain the numbers –  are assumptions, interpretations, judgements and RWA movements documented, defensible, independently challenged and consistently applied? Third, are we proportionate –  are we avoiding both under-compliance and the kind of unnecessary conservatism that quietly constrains capital efficiency and growth? 

Learning outcomes:

By the end of the course, participants will be able to:

  • assess implementation readiness: understand where firms should be in their Basel 3.1 journey and identify the priorities for the final quarter before implementation
  • challenge the numbers with confidence: develop practical techniques to assess data integrity, identify key risks and apply proportionate controls
  • explain the numbers clearly: recognise common blind spots and strengthen the ability to trace, interpret and articulate the drivers behind reported outcomes
  • apply proportionality in practice: build judgement around what is “enough” governance, analysis and documentation – and communicate that rationale effectively to internal and external stakeholders.
     
Anindya Ghosh Chowdhury

Anindya Ghosh Chowdhury

CGO, Katalysys Llt

Anindya has 15-years’ experience in financial services. He is a former PRA regulator and Bank of England auditor, where he worked with a number of int...

Anindya has 15-years’ experience in financial services. He is a former PRA regulator and Bank of England auditor, where he worked with a number of international banking subsidiaries and payment firms. He also led the Prudential Risk Advisory team at a large consulting form, and is a qualified Chartered Accountant.

Read more
Manish Patidar

Manish Patidar

Senior Director – Advisory, Katalysys Ltd

Manish is Katalysys’ in-house Basel 3.1 expert, and have helped c.15 banks on Basel 3.1 implementation. Manish has 12 years of experience in finance f...

Manish is Katalysys’ in-house Basel 3.1 expert, and have helped c.15 banks on Basel 3.1 implementation. Manish has 12 years of experience in finance functions in financial institutions. He has previously worked as Head of Finance at Union Bank of India (UK) Ltd and Director-Finance at Morgan Stanley.

Read more
Owen Selby

Owen Selby

VP – Advisory, Katalysys Ltd

Owen is a former senior supervisor from the PRA, where he has over 10 years’ experience. He has overseen firms across the full spectrum of prudential ...

Owen is a former senior supervisor from the PRA, where he has over 10 years’ experience. He has overseen firms across the full spectrum of prudential risks and governance and brings direct insight into supervisory expectations and regulatory decision-making.

Read more
  • CFOs
  • CROs
  • Heads of Finance
  • Finance
  • Risk Directors
  • Heads of Regulatory Reporting
  • Heads of Prudential Risk