The future of verification: Rethinking financial security

Is traditional background screening fit for purpose?

The opinions expressed here are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of UK Finance or its members.

Financial institutions face an ever-evolving challenge in detecting fraud and financial crime. Despite rigorous screening protocols, it is estimated that between 70-80 per cent of global crime remains undetected. Conventional verification methods rely almost entirely on historical records – if an individual has never been convicted, flagged, or officially documented, they may pass scrutiny without further investigation. Yet, real-world risks often extend far beyond what is formally recorded.

The financial sector increasingly recognises the limitations of traditional checks and the potential consequences of relying on outdated methodologies. But what if risk could be assessed in a way that moves beyond reliance on static records?

The limitations of conventional verification

Most background checks follow a well-established pattern:

  • They search police records, watchlists, and financial histories.
  • They focus only on documented incidents.
  • They fail to detect emerging risks and rely on static databases.

Yet, financial crime networks do not operate within the constraints of historical records. Those involved in money laundering, cyber fraud, illicit financial flows, and other forms of financial crime often avoid detection through sophisticated methods, leaving no direct trace in conventional databases. Similarly, connections to wider networks of criminality, which might serve as early warning indicators, are frequently missed.

Even social media screening offers an incomplete picture. While some checks analyse an individual's publicly available content, they rarely extend to interactions, engagements, or removed materials - critical components in detecting potential risk exposure.

With financial institutions operating in a highly regulated environment, the need for a more advanced, real-time approach to risk assessment is clear.

A new approach to financial security

Advances in digital intelligence have paved the way for new verification methodologies that go beyond historical record-checking. By leveraging real-time analysis of structured, publicly available intelligence, it is now possible to identify behavioural patterns and indicators that might signal financial or security risks.

Institutions seeking to enhance their verification processes have begun adopting solutions that incorporate:

  • Real-time risk detection – monitoring global open-source data to detect emerging threats before they appear in official records.
  • Pattern-based analysis – assessing behavioural indicators linked to fraud, cybercrime, and illicit financial activity.
  • Identity matching technologies – employing facial recognition and other biometric techniques to align digital and physical identities with greater accuracy.

This shift towards intelligence-led verification is already being used to strengthen financial security frameworks. In practice, it allows institutions to refine their assessments, reduce false positives, and improve the precision of compliance processes.

Why this matters to financial institutions

For financial institutions, the stakes are high. Compliance failures, regulatory breaches, and reputational damage can have significant financial consequences. The need to meet increasingly stringent 'Anti-Money Laundering' and 'Know Your Customer' regulations has never been greater.

Integrating enhanced verification practices into existing security frameworks can provide multiple benefits:

  • Strengthening fraud prevention – reducing reliance on static databases and identifying threats earlier.
  • Improving compliance and risk management – providing regulators with a more comprehensive understanding of due diligence efforts.
  • Minimising false positives – enhancing verification accuracy to streamline decision-making.
  • Supporting scalability – adapting to new regulatory requirements and integrating with financial institutions’ existing systems.

In an environment where risk is dynamic, verification must be as well. As financial institutions look ahead, the ability to detect emerging threats through more sophisticated intelligence methodologies will define the next phase of financial security.

Area of expertise: