You can use the search function to find a range of UK Finance material, from consultation responses to thought leadership to blogs, or to find content on a range of topics from Capital Markets & Wholesale to Payments & Innovation.
Following the 2008 financial crisis, regulators have increasingly mandated that financial institutions should demonstrate robust contingency plans for sustained operations during potential recovery or resolution phases, ensuring the protection of retail clients, critical functions and the broader economic landscape.
This drive resulted in the emergence of operational continuity in resolution (OCiR) regulation. This blog examines the degree to which firms have demonstrated effective implementation of OCiR as well as noting areas where further improvement may be needed, Be UK having worked with several clients to support their OCiR adoption.
OCiR is a Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) requirement. Supervisory statement SS4/21 sets out the expectations for banks, building societies and investment firms to ensure the operational continuity of critical services are provided to customers to facilitate recovery actions, resolution and related restructuring.
Implementation of this regulation is mandatory for firms that, within the past 36 months, falls within one of three criteria:
Executives have accountability, under the Senior Managers’ and Certifdication regime, to ensure provision for OCiR and ongoing compliance against the following pillars as shown in figure 1 below.
In assisting various financial institutions with regulation adherence, Be UK has identified common areas where further attention is often needed to ensure robust compliance.
Service mapping
The PRA expects firms to illustrate how operational arrangements support recovery and resolution through a service catalogue. While many firms use static platforms, such as Excel, risking data integrity, adopting dynamic platforms ensures accurate and immediately accessible information, crucial for regulatory inquiries.
Service continuity
Firms must ensure critical service continuity during restructuring, yet deficiencies in playbook coverage are common. Inadequate provisions, communications, and testing scenarios for recovery and resolution may lead to unpreparedness, with regulators potentially requesting this information urgently.
Contract management
Reviewing contracts is imperative to ensure resolution-resilient terms for critical services. If contracts lack protective clauses, firms should develop a remediation plan, including a robust substitutability approach in case suppliers resist adopting revised terms.
Financial resilience
The PRA mandates firms to maintain financial resources for stress resilience, consider charging structures, operational assets, risks, liquidity provisions and early warning indicators. While progress is apparent, firms should anticipate regulatory requests for clear evidence on various financial calculations, ensuring confidence on contingency funding provisions.
Management and governance
Firms require appropriate forums to ensure OCiR's delivery and response to stress scenarios. Confusion is common during recovery and resolution roleplays, often exacerbated by OCiR governance being absorbed into broader committees. Establishing a specialised forum and bolstering OCiR education is crucial for clarity and focussed execution.
Firms will often have many initiatives to consider and cost implications to balance when undertaking regulatory improvements. They should not risk regulator scrutiny through lack of addressing their OCiR gaps, many of which are easily identifiable and rectifiable.
13.12.23
George Peters, Manager, Be | Shaping the Future UK
Marie Simmons, Consultant, Be | Shaping the Future UK
01.05.24
25.01.24
24.01.24
By downloading this document, you understand and agree that any sharing, distribution or republishing of the content, without prior written authorisation from the author or content managers at UK Finance, shall be constituted as a breach of the UK Finance website terms of use.